|
Appeals for Program Level Exams such as, candidacy, comprehensive, or qualifying portfolio or qualifying examinations, are made to the Assistant/Associate Provost of the Office of Graduate Education and Academic Planning based on policy and/or procedural violations. The appeal can be based only on policy and/or procedural violations; and not simply on the outcome of the examination. Procedural violations would be cases in which the program /department failed to follow program/department and/or University policies and/or procedures relating to the administration and/or evaluation of the exam.
The appeal must be made in writing to the Assistant/Associate Provost of the Office of Graduate Education and Academic Planning. Documentation of the policy(ies)/procedures in question must be provided, along with a detailed description of the alleged violation(s). All evidence supporting the alleged violation should also be provided. The student must submit the written appeal to the Assistant/Associate Provost of the Office of Graduate Education and Academic Planning within 30 days of receipt of the outcome of the examination.
Upon receipt of the written appeal to the Assistant/Associate Provost of the Office of Graduate Education and Academic Planning , will investigate the allegation, review the documentation and render a final decision which completes the appeal process. The final decision rendered by the Assistant/Associate Provost of the Office of Graduate Education and Academic Planning may not be appealed.
If it is found that policy/and/or procedure has been violated, the Assistant/Associate Provost of the Office of Graduate Education and Academic Planning will instruct the program/department to allow the student to retake the exam, fully adhering to policy and procedures. In the event of a finding in support of the student allegation, the reexamination may not be counted as one of the attempts permitted under the University or Department’s Reexamination Policy.
|